A newly impinged DepEd memorandum on sex education has once again shaken the foot stool of Catholicism, plagued by criticisms and legal assaults in spite of the urge and goodwill to inform the Filipino youth about the sensitivity of sexuality.
The Department of Education has recently included the sex education campaign in elementary and high schools’ curricula, as the most probable solution towards curbing the country’s population rate to over two percent. This was blamed to be the reason of desperate poverty and the unstoppable rise of the
Yet, the Catholic Church and powerful conservative crusaders have disagreed to the principles that sex education is promoting and filed an injunction, requesting a ban to DepEd’s program.
"Sex education in schools is not the answer to our population problem and poverty," Eric Manalang, head of the conservative political party Ang Kapatiran firmly conveyed.
If they say that this is not a potential cure to our growing number, then this must even be worthy to pursue concerning our youth’s sexuality. If the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines does not agree to what the government sees, maybe they’ll give way in order to provide our teenagers a broader knowledge in regards to handling their sexuality.
"It promotes promiscuity among children... it does not promote the proper values that we want our children to receive in schools and we believe sex education should strictly remain a family affair." Manalang added.
Well I don’t personally believe that sex education would ruin the moral standards of the Filipino youth. Instead, this would help them be aware of the changes that they undergo and will make them understand themselves. This would also give them a clearer perception of out-of-marriage sex.
On the other hand, fund's Philippine Director, Suneeta Mukherjee said that this program’s opponents have nothing to fear.
"We are not encouraging people, or children, to have sexual relationships, we are only helping students handle their sexuality as part of the process of growing up," Mukherjee explained. "Children at this age are very sensitive and must be taught by people in authority." She added.
I strongly believe to what Director Mukherjee stands for. The education department must be too precautionary on this.
However, I rigidly resist to opening up sex education to elementary students. Children below 13 years old must be exempted to this program because it is simply not suitable to their understanding and might serve as deadly poison to their young minds. I am personally against teaching them anything about sex because this would undoubtedly spoil the innocence that we should carefully restore and treasure inside of them.
Sex education is definitely a boon. I don’t find what’s wrong in being informative to students like I am. We are undergoing into the adolescence level. Sometimes, or most of the times rather, teenagers do not tend to understand themselves which at times, leads to early pregnancy, or accumulation of HIV and STDs. They need help. We do.
Moreover, we are undeniably curious and hungry for exploration. Adolescents need proper guidance. If not given the attention and supervision, another life might be turned into nothing. Due to observation and personal stories I have encountered, too many lives were wasted because of what? Ignorance? Curiosity? Lack of knowledge?
YES to adolescents, NO to children.
Teenagers, let us be matured and responsible enough in approaching this topic. Let us grow up and not laugh at “sex education.” Because in the end, we would never like to suffer.
"We just want the children to make responsible decisions.”- Suneeta Mukherjee